I have two adult children with comparable limitations.
That is not more autism. That is a complication on top of autism that we seem to be more susceptible to, neonatally. Base autism is more like Aspergers, having only a deficiency of NT social instincts. (We have always been present in society.)
LFA, with its cognitive deficits (beyond that of just NT social instinct), is injured Aspergers. (It is those numbers that are inexplicably on the rise, and has brought our whole spectrum into the medical spotlight.) Restated, it is only the low-functioning component/modifier that is the learning disability.
Thanks for your reply. That's is a very interesting way of looking at it that I've never actually thought of before and you could be right. I will also add that my 2 severely autistic brothers and myself all had epileptic fits when we were very young children that we seemed to grow out of, adding to the possibility that there could had been something else wrong too. I was also born with a slight back defect where a small part is actually paralyzed, it's not a massive deal, although I'm more prone to back ache and if I tried to touch my toes I can't get much further than my waist (even when I was young and fit). It was also mentioned that I had mild "Spasticity".
This is slightly off subject, but my mother had/has asthma and all 3 of us also needed oxygen at birth, my brother who is most severe of all also needed to be resuscitated after birth, I'm wondering if this had any link to the learning disability component, perhaps it actually even caused brain damage (I could be totally wrong, but I've always wondered this). Also note that I was born in 1969 and my brothers in the early 1970s, so the technology available during childbirth would had been primitive compared to today.
Last edited: