Things have definitely changed over the years. I agree there are a lot of vindictive people out there - both women and men. Today the courts don't automatically give custody to the mom's like they used to - it's on a case to case basis and they are preferring joint custody over anything.
With my divorces I just wanted out - they can have all the possessions if they want. I remember standing in the courtroom in a divorce proceeding with my first husband. The judge was asking my ex who was the primary caregiver - who bathed, fed, clothed, etc the child. He said 'his mother', but he didn't think I should have custody on the basis that I could not financially take care of him. The judge said, "That's what child support is for". He said he still didn't think I should be given custody. The judge asked if he wanted custody and he said no. The judge asked who he wanted to have custody and he said his mother. He did it to himself - I got full custody - he didn't even get set visitation. He moved out of state and I would still allow my son to go visit him.
But today they do prefer joint, unless one parent is abusive or on bad drugs. They really don't consider infidelity at all when it comes to custody. I don't think they take that into consideration with property either - they just try to divide things in half. That might be one reason one or both parties have stopped to lying, because they want more than what the court is going to give them.
And as for those not wanting to get married - I can understand it. In today's society marriage doesn't mean what it used to and there is less true commitment. If both parties are not totally ready for a real commitment it's no more than just living together or dating. I'm about to make some enemies here, but part of the fall in successful marriage has been due to women now having to work and feminism. Used to be the man worked, the woman took care of the house and kids, but now that's almost impossible. Men are getting lazy and don't want to work and support their families and women are working, taking care of themselves and decide they don't need the men to have to take care of them, too.
I think you're right. Women generally have to work to support themselves and their children these days.
I used to handle some divorce cases many years ago. It is the least satisfying area of law practice IMO. Neither side is ever happy and two people cannot live apart as cheaply as they can live together.
I have had crying mothers call me to ask if they can force the fathers to engage in visitation in order to give the children a relationship of some sort with their father and to give the mothers a break from constant child care. The problem is that visitation is a right, not an obligation, so no, the mother cannot force the father to exercise visitation rights. Often, the men who refuse to engage in visitation are the very ones who fought tooth and nail and failed to get sole custody.
I have also had crying fathers call me to ask if they can enforce their visitation rights because the mothers play games, won't make the children available when they are supposed to, and send the children to the father for visitation with ragged, worn out, dirty clothing so the father will purchase new clothes for the children. My advice to the men is to keep appropriate clothing for the children in the man's home and not send the clothing to the mother.
I have seen fathers who quit their jobs just so they don't have to pay child support. I have also seen some judges order unemployed deadbeat dads to pick up aluminum cans on the side of the road to pay $50 per month in child support. The same thing happens with women who owe child support, too.