Well said.I’m too lazy to say “person with autism.” It’s double the syllables. “Autistic” is quicker.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Well said.I’m too lazy to say “person with autism.” It’s double the syllables. “Autistic” is quicker.
I've learnt it is best to respect how other people prefer to be referred to as, although it can be difficult to know or remember who wants to be referred to as autistic person and who wants to be referred to as a person with autism.I think people should respect your choice, personally I prefer to be seen as an autist or as being autistic.
I agree, it can be difficult to remember which form people prefers, but then I also struggle with remembering people's names, or just recognizing them.I've learnt it is best to respect how other people prefer to be referred to as, although it can be difficult to know or remember who wants to be referred to as autistic person and who wants to be referred to as a person with autism.
Personally speaking I prefer not to be referred to as autistic at all. I like being called Aspie.
I never heard Spectrumite before - that is a wonderful word I love people comming up with words like that but I wouldn't use it about anyone unless that was their preference....
I prefer Aspie to Spectrumite. Ugh, I hate that word! Reminds me of some sort of pesty insect, like termite.
You don't have to choose a single way for your self, there are no right or wrong ways in how you want to be referred....
All of the reasons I've seen for the different references are logical and valid, and I respect them all. But it makes matters harder for me to decide how to refer to myself, let alone how to interact/refer to others in the community.
You also cannot control others, just yourself.You don't have to choose a single way for your self, there are no right or wrong ways in how you want to be referred.
I know what you mean. I hate accidentally offended people, and if people accidentally offend me I try to be mindful that they don't know what I'm thinking and didn't offend on purpose.I am struggling a bit by this as well as a new late-diagnosed person. Because I struggle with "fitting in" and not wanting to offend people socially, it was a little overwhelming to come to this community and immediately see that I can cause offense just by referring to someone. Autistic vs With Autism. Asperger's or ASD. On the Spectrum or Neurodivergent. And even things like "puzzle piece or infinity rainbow?"
All of the reasons I've seen for the different references are logical and valid, and I respect them all. But it makes matters harder for me to decide how to refer to myself, let alone how to interact/refer to others in the community.
I can’t stand that term either. There’s something too cutesy and flippant about it, it’s annoying.The one term I can't stand and take offense at is "Aspie". The way it is shortened makes it sound flippant and to me it comes across as derogatory, demeaning and degrading. I am autistic.
Hi @v4169sgr
I personally prefer the other option to you. My reasons are that autism is an essential part of how I am and thus who I am. To me, the word with suggests that I was without before and now have this condition. I have always been autistic, even though I was only diagnosed in my 65th year. Autism is something I have lived with will died with. It cannot be removed, cured or healed. Thus I am an autistic person.
However, I respect your choice, to be considered a "person with autism".
BTW - you might want to google "person first" versus "condition first".
You thought that was a minefield, wait until you google "medical model" vs "social model" of disability.never thought I'd be stepping into a minefield