People don't tell me what pragmatic translates to, and I've not been succesful in finding it despite that my teeth itch.
If you ask me, me for example, i'd argue showing more kindness to some people at least. ... We want to systemize kindness. Yet we do not want to be unfair to individuals.
So "We" must break our system... in favour of a Systemic Reset.
Am I wrong?
Here's a dictionary definition of the meaning of "pragmatic". It matches my intended meaning exactly:
Practical, concerned with making decisions and actions that are useful in practice, not just theory.
What I wanted to capture was that for ASDs it's ok to prefer some approaches to making our lives easier over others, but that we should look for good outcomes, rather than outcomes that conform to a specific approach.
By "approach" is mean principles like the two main ones the OP mentioned. Paraphrased:
1. Change yourself to make interacting with the world easier
2. Change the world to make things easier in a way that doesn't require changing yourself.
BTW I understand that there's an interesting theoretical difference behind those two approaches, and it's fun to philosophize about such things.
But when it comes to practical
results, I do both: I look for the best results for the effort expended to achieve them. Then think about where it fits within the competing theories later
I think your "systematic reset" matches my "change the world" approach. I don't disagree with that, but that doesn't mean I'd exclude "change yourself".
And I certainly think that more kindness and clearer communication would be good for everyone, including (ASDs). Both of those conflict a little with innate human behaviors though, so it will be a slow process.