Who do you mean by "it" ?I imagine the laws and courts are just a framework within which the medical practices of that country have to operate, indeed couldn't operate without, and by their very nature are political entities.
But why would it want to transcend it?
If the courts, our courts (and the state) always have the last word in making such decisions. On the other hand doctors occasionally try to aggressively transcend legal decisions that at times may seem etched in stone. But then their allegiance is not to the state- or the law.
Perhaps part of it has to do with the difference in legal systems. Particularly where the courts maintain control over medical considerations. Then again we have one happening in real time.But that's the case for everything, since it's the legal system that underpins the society. Also, how good a diagnosis is depends on definition
I think you're losing me a bit, I can't put that in context. Where does this suggestion come from? Maybe I've missed something in the thread.
Would be interesting of the highest political authorities yielded to differences over medical interpretations. But that's getting way beyond a discussion of depression.
Last edited: