I have difficulty in understanding many of the replies in this thread, but that is from my shortcomings and not from the contributors. Since my mind works a lot in black and white thinking, it seems to me that one is either self sufficient or not self sufficient. To me is seems that a perfectly healthy NT is always going to be self sufficient - except if that NT decides not to be self sufficient (e.g., lazy) or has a medical issue (e.g., a physical disability). I guess it depends on how self sufficiency is defined. I think a person is self sufficient if that person can survive in his/her own environment without help. I am not self sufficient because I cannot survive in my environment without help - else I would soon end up on the streets and perish.
So first, how can one be more self sufficient than an NT who is perfectly healthy? Second, I don’t understand some of the gray areas described by some. Either you are able to survive or you perish without assistance. Maybe I am thinking too black and white, but that’s the way I see it. (Unless one is referring to a particular attribute.)
@Silhouette Mirage You are not a loser. You said that you are doing your best. That’s all that counts. In fact, I don’t like the word ”loser”, it ranks up there with the word “hate”.