Tobs
Member
I am merely going to correct an assumption as to not be misunderstood by others. I do not wish to antagonize my discussion partner. I merely wished to point out that his personal experience, however extensive, is statistically irrelevant both for quantity and methodologically. They all have one common factor, himself. A factor that is not present on a larger statistical scale. This is why personal experience should never be statistically analysed, but weighed and compared.
I never said you could change someone else's personality. It shouldn't be your intent to. Your mindset affects your surroundings through your behaviour. If you believe something is shallow, you will treat it as such. Generating different results than if you're optimistically open to the situation and don't try to force your own pre-set goals.
To return to the point at hand: Intimate bonds can be formed over the internet, but as someone's online identity is an incomplete form of their physical presence, romantic compatibility is always an unsure factor. In my experience, which I don't claim to be empyrical, being interested in psyche rather than intimacy results in much more interesting experiences.
Ironically, I'm not one for using dating sites. I've met people online but it was always through a shared interest or activity. I prefer to begin a (romantic/platonic)relationship on the basis of some common ground. The only thing everyone on dating sites have in common, is their interest in finding an (emotional and/or sexual) partner. Their motivations and personalities cover too broad a range to generalize.
Your mindset can affect your personality, but it doesn't affect things around you. Being optimistic, or pessimistic doesn't change the personality of someone else.
I never said you could change someone else's personality. It shouldn't be your intent to. Your mindset affects your surroundings through your behaviour. If you believe something is shallow, you will treat it as such. Generating different results than if you're optimistically open to the situation and don't try to force your own pre-set goals.
To return to the point at hand: Intimate bonds can be formed over the internet, but as someone's online identity is an incomplete form of their physical presence, romantic compatibility is always an unsure factor. In my experience, which I don't claim to be empyrical, being interested in psyche rather than intimacy results in much more interesting experiences.
Ironically, I'm not one for using dating sites. I've met people online but it was always through a shared interest or activity. I prefer to begin a (romantic/platonic)relationship on the basis of some common ground. The only thing everyone on dating sites have in common, is their interest in finding an (emotional and/or sexual) partner. Their motivations and personalities cover too broad a range to generalize.