I do ignore some of those I think are trolls, but I dont know if they are currently active.
I find interesting that you (@SimonSays )...We usually talk about how good it is telling the truth, but as a very assertive person who often engages in discussions (and dont ignore them) I can say first hand that even with good data and even trying not to hurt others it may be better to ignore. What do I get from entering those topics? Usually nothing, people who think bad of women will keep thinking the same. People who think bad of men will keep thinking the same. Same goes for people thinking bad of autists or porn watchers. Or black people or whatever other group. What do I get? A false ilussion of being helping to solve the hate problem of mankind? To get ignored myself?
As an example, every time I participate in a porn thread I get the feeling that I had better ignored it instead of entering the discussion. I just find hard to ignore people, but Im learning about it.
I guess there is a correct way of doing it, not ignoring neither engaging, but I have not find it yet. This is a hard topic for me.
I have thought about this topic a lot, and I see three benefits to engaging in a discussion with people you disagree with, even if you are very unlikely to change anyone's mind directly.
- Your opponent doesn't really matter. It's just one person and if they have an opinion strong enough to get into arguments about it is likely related to their identity in some way (same with your opinions, though it might be uncomfortable to admit). However, what does matter is the audience, or other members using the forums who do not take part in the discussion, but still observe the arguments being used. Their pride is not at stake so they are likely to change their mind than your opponent. From reading accounts of people who have changed their minds on big issues (like racism and classism), arguments pretty much never changed what they thought, but observing what other people did or dealt with as well as noticing contradictions in their world view did.
- Related to the first point, but though your opponent may not change their mind immediately, or even soon, arguments do give them some food for thought if they do decide to analyze their believes further. If they never encounter any arguments, they never have a base point to analyze or even distrust their beliefs.
- It gives you training and forces you to research the subject matter further. This means that you are further equipped to take part in arguments further down the line, including if others seek after an argument with you, or directly challenge your beliefs by responding. It also means you can do better in an in person argument (traditionally a weak spot for us).
- [BONUS] It can be fun and stimulating to take part in an argument. I like learning and understanding how people think, so arguments are one of my interests. I enjoy a good discourse whether I am observing it or taking part, and it can be satisfying to take your opponent's argument apart piece by piece, even if it won't change their mind. Of course this depends on how emotionally invested you are in the arguments, or how your opponents or bystanders behave.