You both have a degree of correctNot if they act the fool and feel entitled to use the boyfriend/husband as a personal unpaid bodyguard, that's just toxic.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
You both have a degree of correctNot if they act the fool and feel entitled to use the boyfriend/husband as a personal unpaid bodyguard, that's just toxic.
Not if they act the fool and feel entitled to use the boyfriend/husband as a personal unpaid bodyguard, that's just toxic.
1. God made women and men different. God is a He, in Islam. Mother Nature is innocent. That's how i feel.
2. Instinct are dangerous. A female when young might become pregnant while being careless. ... So it is about controlling people's instincts, ... also being manipulative. But not to be evil.
Males and females are equal in Gods eyes.Did it ever occur to you that the man who impregnates a female has responsibility for his act? Why are you blaming women for men's inability to control their sexual urges? That concept is foreign to and rejected by the modern world.
Males and females are equal in Gods eyes.Did it ever occur to you that the man who impregnates a female has responsibility for his act? Why are you blaming women for men's inability to control their sexual urges? That concept is foreign to and rejected by the modern world.
This seems to be escalating fast. Where did the force part come from? What exactly does it mean?Yes, that's why it is so offensive that men try to force women to hide their bodies from men. It is a "very old, very nasty way to manipulate [women]."
Males and females are equal in Gods eyes.
This seems to be escalating fast. Where did the force part come from? What exactly does it mean?
Is it manipulative equivocation such as "stating a preference is violence" logic?
Or are we talking about actual (highly illegal) violence?
Or credible threats of violence ("force" can be used for this, but it's a different meaning of the same word).
Or is it the force in question "I will divorce you if you go out dressed like that"
A simple scenario (IRL I'd expect more steps, and some negotiation at each step
1. A man's wife goes out to clubs with her GF's once a week, dressed in lets say "club style".
The man asks that she dress less provocatively when she goes out. She says no, and does it anyway.
He than initiates a divorce.
Nobody was forced to do anything. Of course. This is simply a difference on preferences.
2. The same thing, but if's a BF/GF living in the same dwelling.
So the guy moves out.
3. Same, but GF/BF and separate dwellings.
So they never meet again.
In which case(s) (if any) is the man behaving badly?
Why is it wrong to have that preference, and act on it?
Feel free to claim the women dress for themselves /lol.
But the facts are in: they compete with each other. For attention.
The closest thing to human mating protocols is found in birds.
If you want to attack the men of a particular religion, say so at the start.Look at the Muslim faith and then get back to us about forcing women to dress in a certain way.
NoGreat. So women will get 72 virgin males when they reach heaven? Like men getting 72 virgin females in your version of heaven?
Ask me why we Force people I force you to ask me.Look at the Muslim faith and then get back to us about forcing women to dress in a certain way.
Personally I accept that other cultures and/or religions do things in different ways. As did our ancestors.
If that was what was being proposed, perhaps. But as written it's a Straw Man wrapped in weasel words.Nothing wrong with doing things in different ways, but I think it's important to put the foot down and say no when for example people start treating women like cattle and pretend it's normal and perfectly fine. We must have some limits to what we accept, can't blindly accept everything.
If you want to attack the men of a particular religion, say so at the start.
Personally I accept that other cultures and/or religions do things in different ways. As did our ancestors.
Which is interesting for someone who believes in the stronger forms of inherited/generational guilt.
There are few (if any) people alive who didn't have male ancestors who preferred monogamy (or had harems with guards to ensure their wives were faithful).
No
What do you want to do with 72 men? ... tphis is a weak Hadeeth / narration AFAIK
Ask me why we Force people I force you to ask me.
This is a stretch /lol.You need to look at cultures worldwide before you post something.
REMINDER:There have been instances in the past where she will engage in a heated argument with other people. I tend to take a passive and listening role. I try to take a peacemaker role but she says that i am not defending here enough.
Top be honest I am quite stumped. I know I am not a coward and would defend her of course! She is neurotypical btw! Any help would be appreciated!
TY