It was probably far more your statement that such disclosure would have derailed the marriage and not led to what you stated as the horrible outcome of a child with Autism
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
It was probably far more your statement that such disclosure would have derailed the marriage and not led to what you stated as the horrible outcome of a child with Autism
I'm also confident that he would never have had a child with her if he had known of the risk of having autistic child with her.
I went back and checked: and indeed, I got this quote correct.
I understand that your SIL probably is a very difficult person who seems to have deep character problems. I agree that disclosure of known conditions is the right thing to do, and that she was wrong to deliberately conceal such.
But what made me indignant was your own words. I'm autistic, you see.
I helped raise two step-children, I'm on my second successful marriage (widowed,) am a good friend and a good community member, continuously employed since 16 and an excellent student. All this; and I'm a risk?
My parents shouldn't have had me?
If a parent knows a child may have it, it can be a gift. Autism can be a good thing if people know early on. My generation was screwed because we were told we were horrible and demented and mentally ill (those are the nice things I was told). Kids today, I hope, will have it much better when they have autism.