"I believe most people who "self" diagnose actually have autistic traits. Many so called neurotypicals have autistic traits as well. The real question is where do we draw the line for these traits and a disorder? How many are required to be considered a diagnosis?"
Maybe which is why we should not get too bogged down by a word. Aspergers is perhaps a generalisation of a wide-ranging pattern of symptoms of behaviour, at different stages of intensity. My best friend had official diagnosis and, yes indeed, his aspergers was far more open and obvious than my own. For a start, he struggled more than I did to actually talk to people normally. He would stand awkwardly with his feet pointed outwards and very often just say something totally inappropriate to a given situation.
My aspergers is more subtle and I can mask it far more easily. In fact, my difficulties relating to people in general only become more severe as a relationship becomes deeper. Given it[s subtle and not so obvious at first glance doesn't mean it's not a severe obstacle to leading a normal life and sometimes my aspergers can escalate to full meltdowns. That is, seemingly milder symptoms can intensify a lot in my case.
Anyway, a basic guide to diagnosis I think is when the individual is experiencing severe problems of social interaction and has always had a sense of being different.
As for undiagnosed aspies the one who made the biggest impression on me was Hans Christian Anderson. This was because when I first read the story of the ugly duckling I just knew only an A.S. person could have wrtten such a story. It's remarkable that before aspergers ever became an official syndrome, Anderson knew within himself that he was different in the sense of a swan compared to a duck. I have the film of Hans Christian Anderson on DVD actually and I found aspergers was actually written into the script. At one point someone asks Hans " where he was brought up" as Hans had been blowing his nose in a theatre. Hans responds, " not too far from Copenhagan actually" (literal interpretation of intended irony" .
As for "autistic traits", Michael Jackson I think is borderline. Not sure if he had aspergers but most definitely he had deep issues and severe problems relating to the environment around him as a normal adult would. My guess is Jackson probably did have aspergers and a few psychologists also express this view.
I thought Anderson had schizophrenia, that would be more consistent with his apparent personality
There's a video explaining difference between schizophrenia and aspergers/ autism, how they can manifest similarly but how different they actually are, despite of similarities. But I forgot the name of the video.... I should find it again...
Sometimes I wonder why for some people on the spectrum it's so hard to "fake" it, it I seem to come to one conclusion, with absence of deeper processing challenges and other medical conditions it is lack of interest in human behavior. What I mean by that is: in order to learn behavior you have to be motivated in paying attention what other people do and learn from it, whether through observation or instruction. I think the reason why I became so good at communicating with people is because I was fascinated by them since early age. But then again, maybe I'm wrong.... I learned about body language, motivation, psychological "games" they play, what to say and what to do in different situations. I'm not saying I'm a perfect student, sometimes I would get bored, and start wondering why I need all this for, but then quickly snap out of it. My kids seem to have similar interest, so, hopefully with some help they can be successful at socializing as well.....
OK, I'm not exactly sure why I've been writing all this
I'm also not sure what I've been writing on the subject before
anyway...
I think there's very clear difference between people who have Autism and who don't, sometimes people can be misdiagnosed or undiagnosed because there's no medical test, and because people themselves have hard time explaining their symptoms clearly enough, that's why, to a specialist, their symptoms might appear like an indication of a different disorder or something like that.
I personally think Autism tests for higher functioning kids and adults should be modified, you have to pay attention to intelligence level and comparative (hope I can use this word here) executive functioning, comprehension, ability to generalize, sensory processing. As for socializing, tests might need to be directed towards pinpointing differences in perception of human body, body language and behavior in general by people on Autism spectrum.
There's very important difference in the way people with Autism perceive and process information they are receiving.
People can display similar behavior, but there're absolutely different reasons behind the behavior, one person might appear that he has Autism but after careful examination you might discover that the key differences are missing, therefore he can not be considered on the spectrum.
I does seem to me that most of the self-diagnosed folks here are probably on the spectrum...
I'm not going to read through what I've just written. I'm not sure what it is all about but I think I have a point somewhere.... my thoughts are a little scrambled today