@thejuice
and @Jonn (up to a point)
I found a "classification video" but it seems they've taken it too far: IMO there are too many classifications for any of them to be useful /sigh.
IRL there are many varieties of men who are capable and self-confident because they're capable.
All independent, capable people are "Alpha-proof".
Most capable people are either not Betas, or are able to manage the consequences of preferring not to be leaders.
Men self-organize by capability for the task at hand, and can integrate leaders and capable people into that easily.
IMO the interesting additional classifiers are talents like diplomats, mediators, organizers, etc. That kind of innate inclination contributes naturally to a group without negatively influencing "technical efficiency".
To me, Omega and Sigma look like synthetic constructions built from the questionable Alpha/Beta model.
and @Jonn (up to a point)
I found a "classification video" but it seems they've taken it too far: IMO there are too many classifications for any of them to be useful /sigh.
IRL there are many varieties of men who are capable and self-confident because they're capable.
All independent, capable people are "Alpha-proof".
Most capable people are either not Betas, or are able to manage the consequences of preferring not to be leaders.
Men self-organize by capability for the task at hand, and can integrate leaders and capable people into that easily.
IMO the interesting additional classifiers are talents like diplomats, mediators, organizers, etc. That kind of innate inclination contributes naturally to a group without negatively influencing "technical efficiency".
To me, Omega and Sigma look like synthetic constructions built from the questionable Alpha/Beta model.