Well, that's not far from it, but obviously LSD and similar psychedelics have a far more intense effect in that fashion, and can disrupt and change thought patterns on a much longer term - the changes can be at a lower level of burnt in behaviour and produce bigger modifications.Sound like the effects of LSD.
Everything destroys brain cells!It has been said that excessive use of Mary destroys brain cells.
But the terpenoids that are the active constituent of cannabis are actually not very toxic at all. Compared to even modest amounts of alcohol, cannabis is far safer on that level. That's not to say it's a safe drug, but the physical toxicity is remarkably low. The effects of combustion though are a different matter. Lots of carbon monoxide for example, very toxic, and many other undesirable compounds are formed in the high temperature reactions. But I've not ready any published research on the matter so I don't know how toxic.
Oxy is a big and (now) publicised example and particularly grievous, but actually the whole pharma industry tends to run on developing the drugs that will generate the best profits over those that which benefit people the most. So a drug that alleviates symptoms of a long term illness are preferred to be targeted for development over a drug that actually cures something outright and isn't required long term. Obviously they do also develop proper cures too, and not all companies act the same, but focus is profit for them not health for others in general.Like Oxycontin.
I absolutely would! You are spot on! Imagine an Aussie who hates the amber nectar!You would make a terrible Aussie.
Probably grounds for prosecution over in the antipodes!