• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

What was the last movie you watched?

wyverary said:
I guess I just have no taste, then... :unhappy:

I am actually not a Hitchcock fan, so I had no pretensions going into it, which I am sure is why I enjoyed it so much.
Click to expand...

Don't take my response so seriously. My tastes can be kind of odd sometimes. If other people enjoy that movie, fine, but I personally don't see what's supposed to be so great about it. I thought Rear Window was much better.
 
Pacific Rim, in 3D. I loved it, that particular scene about the memories of Mako seemed to me like one of the best scenes I have ever seen in a movie... And I'm one of those guys who hated Transformers...

Also made addicted to the main theme:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Braindead.jpg


So awesome . . .

A bit hard to believe that Peter Jackson, director of the Lord of the Rings films, made it.
 
King_Oni said:
Star Trek; Into Darkness
Click to expand...

That was a good one. Mom and I are both Trekkies and we've really enjoyed what JJ Abrams has done with it. Aside from one scene that really felt forced (I'm sure you can guess which one), I thought Into Darkness did an excellent job putting a new spin on an old story. What I assumed the explanation was for why the villain turned up years before he should have turned out to be the explanation they used. Far from making the film clich? and predictable, however, it just means that JJ Abrams is thinking like a Trekkie. This is especially good considering he admitted to not being a fan before making the first film. Assuming he won't be doing the third film due to working on the new Star Wars trilogy, his presence will be sorely missed on the next installment. I wish his replacement the best of luck. They're going to have a lot to live up to.
 
I watched Rain Man for the first time with my friends when I took my vacation there the past few days. After Rain Man I watched the old classics
South Pacific and Music Man.

I have never watched these films before. I found them very enjoyable.
 
I tried watching kick ass 2. Got bored and quit. Then went on to watch- Happy People: A Year in the Taiga. Its a documentary about folks who make a living by trapping animals in siberia. Its a visually stunning film.
 
The Jan Svankmajer short film Dimensions of Dialogue:

[video=dailymotion;x2gtpo]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2gtpo_jan-svankmajer-dimensions-of-dialog_shortfilms[/video]

The last section is my favourite.
 
I have movies on DVD, I don't see movies in theaters unless it really interests me to see it while it is out in Theaters.

But, the last movie I watched was The Avengers. :)
 
finished watching the yellow sea on netflix. A korea. thriller actiom movie. Really good. Pretty violent.
Also watched seoul cafe about a bakery in korea.
I love korean movies.
 
Just got home awhile ago from watching The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones movie. I am pissed. It is based on a book series by cassandra clare called you guessed it The Mortal Instruments. Hence the first book is City of Bones. It was well done cinematography. However, They changed the entire last half of the movie from the book. I am not pleased. They didn't even delve into the characters which even my mom who hasn't read the book said she found it too confusing at times why? Because they didn't explain anything. I am just righteously annoyed to find out that the author sold out. She gave Screen Gems the rights with no input. Who does that? It was a good movie apart from it being based on the book. Breath Breath...I will stop my aspie rant because I know that I already had a semi almost meltdown in the car on the way home. I was that upset.
 

Duran Duran: Sing Blue Silver

Technically, it's not a film. But I was obsessed with DD since junior year in HS :) And it looks like a film, so :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arashi222 said:
Just got home awhile ago from watching The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones movie. I am pissed. It is based on a book series by cassandra clare called you guessed it The Mortal Instruments. Hence the first book is City of Bones. It was well done cinematography. However, They changed the entire last half of the movie from the book. I am not pleased. They didn't even delve into the characters which even my mom who hasn't read the book said she found it too confusing at times why? Because they didn't explain anything. I am just righteously annoyed to find out that the author sold out. She gave Screen Gems the rights with no input. Who does that? It was a good movie apart from it being based on the book. Breath Breath...I will stop my aspie rant because I know that I already had a semi almost meltdown in the car on the way home. I was that upset.
Click to expand...

I know how you feel. I felt the same way when I realized The Amazing Spider Man was a giant turd of a film, absolutely horrible, and not in a cheesy, campy good way either. It was so bad that Marvel gave up their involvement in the franchise completely so they could deny having anything to do with it. What's worse is there are people who think this is what Sam Raimi's films should have been. *facepalm*
 
I watched In Bruges last night with my mum. I had seen it already, but it was good to watch it again, catch all the little things I missed last time. Still a great film.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom