• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

What was the last movie you watched?

Shin Godzilla (2016)

Pretty good - bit slow at places and takes a while to get going, but the new origins for Godzilla (this been one of the few Japanese Godzilla movies in which he's not a dinosaur mutated by atomic tests back in the 40's/50's) and the way he changes and evolves to adapt to different scenarios was interesting, especially when he gained the ability to shoot his atomic beam from his mouth, tail tip and his back.
 
170808-news-a-christmas-story.jpg

a-christmas-story.jpg

A Christmas Story - Wikipedia

 
pzRPzT9.png


I've just watched the original 1982 Blade Runner, it was one of the very few sci-fi movies I've never watched as I couldn't get into it when I was younger (I only watched 10 minutes of it).

I won't write too much about what happens except what is already given away at the very start of the movie just in case anyone still hasn't seen it.

Apparently in November 2019, which is just under 2 years from now at the time of writing, we will all be travelling around in flying cars and space ships with anti-gravity technology Etc. even around super high tech cities using sky roads and we will also be travelling to numerous other planets exploring and colonising (this will be accepted as the norm). There will also be replicants that are manufactured humans (somewhat similar to androids, but genetically made) that are very difficult to distinguish from normal humans that have rebelled against us, they will be banned from Earth and Blade Runners will be employed to hunt down, killing them on site (called retirement). What's odd is we will apparently be using old 4:3 CRT monitors again including sometimes even old style green screen monitors and early 1980s keyboard.

You might think I'm being a bit harsh, but in the original 1960s Star Trek that was much earlier than Blade Runner, the viewscreen on the Starship Enterprise wasn't CRT or even a number of CRT monitors connected together in a matrix, in fact there was a very large flatscreen 16:9 viewscreen on the bridge and no other CRT monitors were anywhere to be seen or anything else that we often see in old sci-fi set in the future such as old large reel computer tapes for instance, plus there was no keyboards and mainly voice recognition. Mr. Spock even controlled what appeared to be a mouse on the bridge and in one episode they even used what were video disks. They might have thought it would take longer than it did, but the communicators looked like flip mobile phones that were more popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Medical and even other tricorders are also starting to become a reality. They even had automatic doors that opened as you approached them (they weren't the norm in the 1960s). In fact a lot of technology that featured in Star Trek is coming true and unlike Blade Runner they also chose a more realistic year to set the series in that none of us or even anyone we ever meet younger than us will live to, not just 37 years after it was made. Blade Runner should have been set in the year 2219 or at least 2119, not 2019. In other words when they made the original Star Trek they really thought about the future and made some amazing predictions with some that may still be yet to come, they were also careful not to show obvious 1960s technology.

One big thing I can fault about both the original Star Trek and Blade Runner however is the fashions, if anything Star Trek was if anything worse in this department. If Star Trek was made well enough you wouldn't watch it and immediately know that it was made in the 1960s, the problem is the fashions looked like the 1960s including women's short skirts Etc. and even though they're trying to show a future of equal rights for women and also equal racial rights (which was quite new back then), many women were still treated like many would be in the 1960s and often like sexual objects (a very controversial episode of Star Trek at the time of broadcast involved an interracial kiss). Probably the worst Star Trek episode for giving away that it was made in the 1960s was about space hippies that acted exactly like 1960s hippies did with the same ideas, but in space. Similar is true with Blade Runner, it's immediately clear that it was made in the 1980s just by the style, fashion and even hair styles, but it's still not as obvious as Star Trek was. If I was making a movie now set in the future I would need to be extremely careful not to use anything that shows 2017 styles what-so-ever including clothing, hairstyles or even makeup, I couldn't even use special effects that were particularly popular at this time and ideally someone watching it wouldn't know exactly when it was made in say 40 years time.

A clip from Blade Runner (1982):
LA is apparently going to be like this in less than 2 years time (at the time of writing), and retro must be the in thing even in flying cars with their on board 4:3 CRT non flat screen monitor with retro graphics. Oh and I don't know what happened to mobile phones as no-one uses them anymore and there's even a high tech phone box at the beginning of the clip. An absolutely brilliant soundtrack composed by the legendary Vangellis however, he also composed the stunning music to timeless classic Chariots of Fire. The special effects were also absolute state of the art for 1982 and not surprisingly won various awards, in fact they're not half bad even now (edit: surprisingly the special effects themselves were only nominated for various awards, please click here for details).

I could look at sci-fi that has predicted the future even worse, for instance I don't remember us flying around in super high tech space ships fighting against hostile aliens around 18 years ago like in the 1970s sci-fi TV series Space 1999. Even worse I don't remember us being at war with aliens invading Earth in a similar ridiculously high tech space fighting environment way back in 1980, the year that the 1970 sci-fi TV series U.F.O. was set, but the high tech is also mixed with technology from 1970 like the old large reel computer tapes and 1970 fashion is in your face.

U.F.O., a much worse future prediction than even the original Blade Runner:
I can't remember it being like this way back in 1980, I really must have amnesia or something?
 
Last edited:
Thirty years ago I was told that flying cars would be commonplace by now and I have been waiting ever since then. It is good to know that I only have to wait for two more years.
 
Thirty years ago I was told that flying cars would be commonplace by now and I have been waiting ever since then. It is good to know that I only have to wait for two more years.

Flying cars? Won't happen, and even if they did the government on both sides of the Atlantic would Tax the pants off people owning them.
 
Flying cars? Won't happen, and even if they did the government on both sides of the Atlantic would Tax the pants off people owning them.
I wouldn't say never and there is already versions of flying cars, but for them to be feasible for normal everyday use by the average person there would need to be a breakthrough in anti-gravity technology, if they found a way to shield against gravity (which I believe is possible) a flying car would simply float as if it was in space without even needing cumbersome wings, then it would need hardly any energy to take off and less energy to move over distance than a traditional land car would because without any friction with the ground there would only be air friction, although a fair bit of energy would still be required to manoeuvre. An anti gravity vehicle would also probably be much safer as there would probably only be a slim chance of it uncontrollably falling out of the sky even if damaged or during mechanical failure, assuming the anti-gravity technology itself is reliable. Without anti-gravity they will never be feasible apart from for a handful of wealthy people as the energy and fuel required to defy gravity is simply too great, especially in this type of vehicle without large wings or rotors and they'd have high maintenance costs having to constantly check them to keep them reasonably "safe" like any traditional aircraft. We don't truly know how far we've progressed with anti-gravity however, some people believe we've already captured alien technology for instance (I'm open minded on that one), the Nazi's were also allegedly working on a type of anti-gravity, although I suspect they were just testing a flying saucer shaped aircraft that exerts an uplift greater than the force of gravity downwards (there is evidence they at least tested this type of aircraft and they even know where the original test site was), I am sceptical that actual anti-gravity was truly involved, to learn more about these Nazi experiments please click here, for some unofficial speculation about anti-gravity being used please click here. Similarly Frisbees fly and can even gain altitude while rotating, but it's not anti-gravity, please click here to learn more.

Not a bad attempt however even without anti-gravity. It's cheaper, cleaner, better and more feasible than what we've seen so far, but still ridiculously expensive compared to traditional land vehicles and they're still obviously having to use a lot of energy to fight against gravity, but it does still have small traditional wings that greatly help unlike in many movies such as Blade Runner (they will however somewhat get in the way when parking on the ground making them require a lot more space than traditional cars). Even if it does make mass production (it's a big IF with getting through all the health and safety requirements), it's likely only to be affordable by the rich and famous at first, although perhaps it will eventually become more accessable to people who are just quite wealthy that still can't currently afford to regularly travel by private helicopter at the moment.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen Blade Runner but I've read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the Philip K Dick novel on which the film is allegedly based. What do blades have to do with it, because I don't recall any mention of them in the book?

The last film I saw was Scrooge (1960 adaptation of A Christmas Carol), yesterday.
 
I saw A Hard Day's Night yesterday. It seemed a fitting way to round off a year in which I've visited the Beatles Story in Liverpool and Beatles-Platz in Hamburg.
 
"David and Lisa"

Sensitive film about mentally disturbed young people existing in a mental institution and the medical professionals trying to help them.

A film that has always stuck with me since seeing it in high school. Worth seeing.

 
Last edited:
Star Wars: The Last Jedi, seen it twice so far and I'd rate it 9.5/10, better in 2D than IMAX IMO.

And then we went to see another film last weekend, which I would rate about a 7 but I can't remember what it was lol, oh yeah it was Pitch Perfect 3.

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle 7/10.

Normally I don't rate Dwayne Johnson's acting ability, as an actor he was a good wrestler, but this wasn't too bad.
 
Last edited:
"The Thing" (2011)

A remake of a remake hiding behind the premise of a prequel. However the 1982 remake was infinitely better than both this one and the original production made in 1951.

Although with a slightly different twist to it as a prequel, this latest attempt had a no-name cast without any real character development with a blasé soundtrack where even good special effects couldn't save it.

You couldn't help but compare it to the 1982 version which IMO is one of the best sci-fi films ever made. A very rare distinction considering most if not nearly all remakes are inferior to their earlier counterparts. Though in all fairness at the time the 1951 film was well received by the movie-going public.
 
Last edited:
"David and Lisa"

Sensitive film about mentally disturbed young people existing in a mental institution and the medical professionals trying to help them.

A film that has always stuck with me since seeing it in high school. Worth seeing.


OMG Judge, this is one of my all time most favorite films but have never met anyone else who knew about it. I also rewatched it a few weeks ago and it was just as I remembered it.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom