David Bowie is consistently a bit flat, and sounds good doing it .
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
It's been an interesting path...all the way from using conventional tape splicing techniques in 1973 to make Richard Nixon say anything we wanted (which was very entertaining)...to asking AI today to make modern celebrities say absurd things (which I leave to others). More proof that advancing technology always will be....misused.what was meticulously created in a sophisticated sound studio versus a more impromptu
LOL...point taken.It's been an interesting path...all the way from using conventional tape splicing techniques in 1973 to make Richard Nixon say anything we wanted (which was very entertaining)...to asking AI today to make modern celebrities say absurd things (which I leave to others). More proof that advancing technology always will be....misused.
Or, is it that there are simply people who will always misuse whatever they can get their hands on, so will naturally adopt any new technology they can put to their use? Simply human nature, or at least one aspect.More proof that advancing technology always will be....misused.
Indeed I am. Spector is largely credited with turning audio engineering into an art form of its own. It's funny how we have all the dynamic range we want with 24-bit recordings, whereas magnetic tape was at best 30 dB. But today, the dynamic range is gone. At least with today's technology there's some hope for intoxicated Karaoke singers.
Spector was an impressive artist, but doing recordings like that is similar to doing a cover of someone's original track, as it's produced.
I think auto-tune is cheating if you don't know in advance that something is being auto-tuned. When I watched Les Miserables in the theater, I'd read that everything was auto-tuned because none of the leads is a professional singer.
I have been revisiting Deftones and I had an epiphany that Chino Moreno uses autotune. I was quite shocked as I always thought they were this 'authentic' band. The older they got the more 'melodic' (commercial?) they became, auto tune lets them have ideas above their station. They started out as a shouty rap metal band, which pretty much toasted the singers voice after the first album tour. You can hear a degradation after each album, a low on 'Saturday Night Wrist' and a bit of a recovery afterwards.
I still like them, but it does feel a little like I was deceived. Like most of the bands I grew up with.
@Judge
You are right there never has and never will be brakes on technology, music included. I suspect the next 10 years what’s left of the recording industry will be all AI artists and for anybody to experience music before the advances in technology one would have to go out and see a band for a human musical experience if they so desire . Almost like going to a museum, one could show their children all the old tools people used to use to create things.
Individuality is on the decline in the arts or what is left of it. I can see advertisements in the future for the newest song! All natural made by a human , all organic. And will be 10 times more expensive to hear something with less ingredients
However on the topic of compression, I'm not a fan of the super compressed and crushed tracks. Loudness wars will hopefully come to an end. Yes some genres are known for it but what can you do
I think it depends, I'm not a fan of artists using it all the time but sometimes a singer or instrument player gets everything spot on, the intensity, the emotion etc, but then a few notes are off. To preserve the artistic elements, it's better to use autotune or melodyne to target and correct those minor issues, kind of like spell check. It's also acceptable if they use it artistically like TPain ... When done tastefully.
However, if an artist is using it to cover up a lack of ability then it's a bit like using performance enhancing drugs lol.
I wonder when synthesizer and drum machines came out, if people were having the same debate on whether it's cheating . Now we are embarking into the AI generation so who knows what will be considered cheating or not. Technology and music will always go together, an instrument could be thought of as a technology I suppose.
However on the topic of compression, I'm not a fan of the super compressed and crushed tracks. Loudness wars will hopefully come to an end. Yes some genres are known for it but what can you do
Spell check is a good analogy. Have we been reared to expect perfection though. Hearing a mistake on an old record is almost exciting to me. Aha, a human made this!
Listening to Louie Louie, the drummer is wild, almost a child like playfulness, love it. And, gasp, not always in time. He definitely influenced Keith Moon, especially the enigma of fills that groove/ grooves that are fills. Wouldn't get away with all this profligacy these days!Some mistakes can definitely make them more fun. "Louie, Louie" and "Come as You Are" come to mind. Or "Little Pad" by The Beach Boys, which seems like it wasn't even complete.
There’s a story I’ve seen from several sources that the drummer actually dropped his drumstick during the recording and yelled the F word, which you can faintly hear.Listening to Louie Louie, the drummer is wild, almost a child like playfulness, love it. And, gasp, not always in time. He definitely influenced Keith Moon, especially the enigma of fills that groove/ grooves that are fills. Wouldn't get away with all this profligacy these days!