I'm not insulting you. I'm pointing out that you have no idea what the hell you are talking about.
apt-get , You have yet to quote 1 fact to prove your view of me, am I supposed to take your word on it? You haven't even seen my real nuclear system yet, how do you know how good it is? So what if I use different names for things? Is pleasing your professors union rules or something.
....
I used almost none of the modern work so why do I need to make attribution?, it is all mine, I'll name it how I like.
If I may point out respectfully Apt-get telling a auspie savant he has no clue on his special interest, is like dumping a bucket of chum over your head while standing in the water off Miami beach in Florida on shark migration day.
After looking over my posts Apt-get I see I did drop in a shot at the U.S. government and a certain party associated with them on the end of a post to you. I apologize for that confusion, I assumed you had Back read my thread and would know I was addressing them in my previous conversation with them.
I do how ever see my self (with my work) as being in (direct conflict) with organized (political / humanist religious parties) in the scientific and defence contract community. I expect the kitchen sink to get thrown at me, as I am a real threat to their philosophical empire, nobody is going to thank me for turning the apple cart over. There are papers, jobs, grants, and reputations, and emotional sentiments on the line...Mael doesn't expect to get roses
thrown at him.
That last post I deleted wasn't to you, it was to the U.S. government, they made my brother sign some loyalty to the government thing or something before he could sell his house in Tennessee and move back out here. My brother chewed me out over my nuclear stuff real hard when he came through on his move back, forbid me to speak on my nuclear stuff ever again...so I'm guessing the two events are linked? Or at least he blames me for drawing in the government on him...no one is really speaking to me properly on it, so that's all I know.
I haven't checked your name against the (Do you believe in God) thread but I think perhaps it was you, who in a effort to break my logic loop there on Darwin, argued against the (eternal nature) of (time) (motion) and (matter)...and then said that the possibility of life evolving (only applied to earth)....
is that a science rule
...that earth is unique, and the only place in the universe where life can evolve?
....what law stops the a being of maximum evolved power from having been produced in the infinite past on some other planet?????
But perhaps you didn't write that? my apologies if it wasn't you, your name looked similar maybe someone else did? I'll have to check.
I stand by my position that no state is permitted to exist in the past, that would destroy our present state of the universe.
(Time) and (motion) in the universe can not be stopped nor can (true destruction of matter) happen...Big Bang is over collection of matter (stopping motion)
and it breaks numerous other laws of gravity, movement and logic.
I am not going to show you the heart of my Maelstrom system, end of story, it's not going to happen, there are new nuclear weapons involved. You know perfectly well by now my system is underived from conventional work. And that I came up with it to overturn that work because I hold most of it in contempt as, Dark Philosophy & Theology, not science.
[/QUOTE]
