It's from this article here -
This Graphic Shows What the Autism Spectrum Really Looks Like
All I can suggest is that you
1. Register a formal complaint that you think that the assessor is using clinically irrelevant or obsolete criteria
2. That you think the interviewer has conducted the interview incompetently. Eg re. your ability to read expressions, has he made any attempt to distinguish between an effort-free intuitive ability and a cognitive one that will lead to burnout if used for long periods?
3. That you present a list of the problems that you have and ask him to score you on each or provide a written explanation of why they are not relevant to a diagnosis - so you can challenge him later. Include examples of your behaviour for each one.
Basically, you need to prepare the ground for questioning his decision - there is always a higher level to go to - and to make it awkward and risky for him to be ignore points. You might want to submit a note saying something like
"I answer questions EXTREMELY literally. So eg when the interviewer asked if I can read facial expressions I said yes - but this is because I learned to as a deliberate skill, it is NOT intuitive for me. Doing so costs me a great deal of effort and results in headaches and depression and I can only do it for a limited time. With this extra information, would the assessor agree this consistent with autism? If not, why not? (And I do think that questions like this need to be phrased more carefully in the future because of the tendency of autistic people to answer with extreme literalness!)"