Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
For that, the solution is either synthetic, carbon-negative fuel, or battery swaps at the truck stops. If they put in any effort, those could be done in a minute. A truck fleet could do their own, or we could have standard modules that zip in and out, and let you run fewer of them for lighter weight at lower range. It would also be very easy to rig up robots to plug into cars whenever they are close enough and stationary. Capacitors are short-range, but they can take a full charge in seconds, perhaps at a stop light.Here's where the whole electric concept completely falls over for us. It's 5000 Km from one side of our country to the other and these things never stop moving, a new driver gets slotted in to the seat every 8 hours but time is money. It doesn't stop except to refuel and change drivers. If trains on rails were more practical we'd use them.
View attachment 92930
If you look on the back of a Canadian dime, you see the image of the "Bluenose," a schooner that got fish to market faster than any other boat of the time. However, synthetic fuel would keep the current fleet going until normal replacement time, and may always be the cheapest option for coolers and such.This is why our richest mining magnate, who also owns trucking companies and cattle stations, has invested so much in the ammonia fuel technology. It's really not very far away from becoming a reality.
And as I mentioned in an earlier post - shipping. It's not so bad for the large freighters but it's a very different story for the tuna and prawn boats that go out to sea for weeks at a time. Internal combustion is still going to be with us for a very long time.
Here's where the whole electric concept completely falls over for us. It's 5000 Km from one side of our country to the other and these things never stop moving, a new driver gets slotted in to the seat every 8 hours but time is money. It doesn't stop except to refuel and change drivers. If trains on rails were more practical we'd use them.
View attachment 92930
A lot of people aren't careful enough when overtaking them either. If road conditions are a bit rough or if there's cross winds that last trailer can swing from side to side a fair bit.
And you know exactly how skilled a driver is when you watch them reverse one.
Many pre WW2 headlamps were actually dire. Even the big ones, such as the Lucas P100, made lots of light but it wasn't focused so you couldn't see a thing. Most lights even into the 70s were poor.Early cars had a mix of steam, internal combustion, and electric power, and a few combined systems. Early radiators were made by boilermakers. It was the electric self-starter, developed by Leyland for Cadillac that settled the issue. Having electricity on board also did wonders for the headlights, etc.
Dynamos used to run all of New York City. The biggest problem with English cars was "the Prince of Darkness" - Charles Lucas. I've driven two Lucas cars that spontaneously fried large percentages of their wiring. By 1930 there were some extremely well-focussed headlights available, but they were neither required nor demanded.Many pre WW2 headlamps were actually dire. Even the big ones, such as the Lucas P100, made lots of light but it wasn't focused so you couldn't see a thing. Most lights even into the 70s were poor.
Part of the problem was that they were using (here in the UK at least) dynamos that couldn't make enough power for higher wattage bulbs. Here in the UK you don't start seeing alternators until the fifties.
On further reflection
I think (I know) that I dislike change, and have a tendency to be at least slightly a luddite in some things
I'm just afraid about what potential change means to my lifestyle... And a fear of what I might lose along the way... Although I have also looked at least a little at some of the facts (perhaps fiction?) behind all of this...
Anyway, off in my gas powered compact car to head out and explore a local park
With most EVs the regenerative braking systems are adjustable,...and even can be turned off. Anyone who lives with snow and ice should be aware of this. Having said that,...I've always kept it at maximum and have never had any wheel slip. The motor controllers are transferring power to alternate wheels with 2* of wheel slip,...the very best traction control on an ICE vehicle is 180*. I literally don't think I have ever sensed ANY wheel slip on snow and ice with my Nissan or my Teslas. Again,...the media greatly exaggerates these things to trigger your amygdala.There's a warning about electric cars in the newspaper here today. Some cars will brake a little on their own when you lift your foot off the gas pedal, to charge the battery. They charge it with the brake effect. But if this happens in a turn on an ice covered Scandinavian road you'll most likely go into the ditch. Which has happened to several people lately. So they are actually warning people and telling them to turn off that break charging thing.
I really do not like cars that does things on their own. When I drive, I want full control over everything. I don't want the car to drive me, I want to drive it.
With most EVs the regenerative braking systems are adjustable,...and even can be turned off. Anyone who lives with snow and ice should be aware of this. Having said that,...I've always kept it at maximum and have never had any wheel slip. The motor controllers are transferring power to alternate wheels with 2* of wheel slip,...the very best traction control on an ICE vehicle is 180*. I literally don't think I have ever sensed ANY wheel slip on snow and ice with my Nissan or my Teslas. Again,...the media greatly exaggerates these things to trigger your amygdala.