Well I can only speak of the UK's health service, but even the most basic health care has been hollowed out so much over the last decade or so (although it was already in a downward spin) they struggle to provide that. To expect them to then train up GP's and ancillary staff on autism and provide funding for new services is unrealistic, they can't provide proper cancer services any more, as for autism? Ha!
My current position on the waiting list for a first appointment means I have another five years to wait. Assuming it doesn't degrade further which currently is highly likely to put it mildly (frankly I don't expect to ever get anything by the time I'm head of the queue). Many doc's are so over worked and under resourced over here, the poor sods struggle to help with the simplest of ailments. While it feels personal to us, it's a sign of social/political disfunction, and every member of the electorate is responsible, not the people we (badly) choose to vote in, blaming the medics is misdirecting our ire (I speak only of UK, no experience or knowledge of elsewhere).
Without re-investment in health services (which even our current 'socialist' gov is most reluctant to do) any boost to autistic services at all levels will come at the expense of other failing sectors - cardiac treatments, asthma services, mental health services (illnesses, that is), cancer treatments, etc etc. All life effecting and life threatening. How does anyone balance that?
The problems are societal, the symptoms appear in the failure of services. Minorities are mostly the one's who notice. and/or suffer for it, which is the nature of service cuts - it's the cut's that impact fewest people, as they may vote the other way next election (and when the cuts start effecting majorities you know things are bad!).
The money to do all this has always been there, it's just been incorrectly (misanthropically) redirected to private personal and organisational fortunes.