I suspect our contribution to nature and wildlife matters more than we could ever imagine. These are realms where many Aspergers seem to have an effortless understanding and a natural aptitude or intuition: Higher empathy for animals?
I remember seeing a 'Nightmare Neighbour' programme about an adult autistic son living with his single mother on benefits. Their neighbours chopped down a bush on their own property that the autistic son liked to look at and draw. He was so distraught about the loss of the bush, I think he took a knife to his neighbours. Naturally, the oblivious, mainstream neighbours focused on his lack of boundaries and lack of understanding of propriety and the law, but all I could see was the kinship he obviously felt towards the bush; their chopping it down was akin to their murdering his friend. His acute sensibility towards the bush - attributing it with infinitely more value than the mainstream does - was not recognised, let alone appreciated. He was just written off - confirmed as disabled, insane and criminal (the three often go together).
Similarly, William Stillman contends in 'The Soul of Autism' (2008) that autistic individuals are ‘harmoniously attuned’. They have a natural capacity for appealing to other beings with a language unique to those harmoniously attuned. He cites an anecdote about a boy called Adam who takes an interest in any plant, tree or bush. Even the ones sprayed with weed killer will flourish after he has taken an interest in them. This autistic ability is neither recognised nor valued by the mainstream, which construes the inability to discern NT intentions and coherent systems of thought as giving rise to a "literal mind". Literal minds are said to be impaired in terms of the ability to understand deception, jokes, lies, metaphors, sarcasm, insincerity, snideness, facetiousness and sabotage. But what about people who have deficits in harmonious attunement? Perhaps education systems should rate people on how they interact with animals, how many they have helped or saved, and how they treat plants and trees. (My own personal litmus test for empathy with dogs would be: do you attached your dog's lead to a collar around the dog's neck, or is the lead attached rather to a harness? I wince every time I see a dog being lead by its neck. A harness around the torso I feel is much more ergonomic and humane. Dogs should have collars for identification purposes only; otherwise the collar should not be touched).
I feel we are millennia away from appreciating the non-mainstream intelligences and understandings of many AS individuals. The key is for Aspergers in turn not to neglect or under-appreciate the intelligences and understandings of animals and plants. Don't be swayed by the mainstream who do not have the insight/IQ or CQ to appreciate how valuable animals and nature are. Don't merge 'our' values into 'their' values. Perhaps this is the best way one can 'fight back': by feeding and protecting the wild animals in our yard - deer, rabbits, foxes, birds, turtles - and by consciously recognising this as a vital and priceless contribution to the world - even if no one else is conscious enough to recognise it.
What a fabulous post! Agree with all of it!!