Electric cars have more torque than any muscle car, I may buy a used hybrid in the future we do a lot of mid distance driving100 to 200 km a lot in rural areas with no infrastructure other than gasoline stations.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Here we have similar issues but with heat instead of cold. Also our large cities are few and great distances apart with very little in between, there's plenty of charge points up and down the east coast because that's densely populated but for the rest of the country trying to install that sort of infrastructure simply isn't feasible. Canada also has this issue, more importantly for freight transport than for privately owned cars.So refusing to buy an electrical car comes from wanting to be alive, okay, sounds good to me!
I haven't read any other posts.There is 16 pages here. Can i get a TLDR for why people don't like electric cars?
aha okay, i didn't know about many things you named, some of them just don't sound logicalI haven't read any other posts.
-Too expensive...
-Limited mileage with one "tank"...
-Very few public charging stations...
-Too long to "fill up the tank"...
-Charging is more expensive than using petrol, (so I have been told)...
-Australia is BIG, and EVs are not suitable for country driving...
-Second-hand market price is horrendous...
-A new battery has a limited life and is around 45% the cost of some cars...
-Batteries have a history of exploding. I prefer to die of natural causes...
-In a country that is struggling with electricity cost and electricity production, they want to exacerbate the problem by forcing us into electricity "eat" vehicles..
ammonia fuel is more eco-friendly?Here we have similar issues but with heat instead of cold. Also our large cities are few and great distances apart with very little in between, there's plenty of charge points up and down the east coast because that's densely populated but for the rest of the country trying to install that sort of infrastructure simply isn't feasible. Canada also has this issue, more importantly for freight transport than for privately owned cars.
So we've got our fingers crossed that the ammonia fuel technology will take off instead. Toyota are trialing those in some parts of Asia now. So we can still have our internal combustion engines but without fossil fuels.
Much more friendly as far as the ozone layer and globally warming gases are concerned. The exhaust is several different forms of Nitrous Oxide which isn't real good for mammals, lizards or birds but won't contribute to global warming.ammonia fuel is more eco-friendly?
Carbon Engineering of Squamish BC did a demonstration over a decade ago, making synthetic gasoline just from wind and air, at an affordable price. The process could be tweaked to divert some carbon into stable construction materials, making it a carbon-negative fuel that would instantly turn a monster truck into a big Green machine.So we've got our fingers crossed that the ammonia fuel technology will take off instead. Toyota are trialing those in some parts of Asia now. So we can still have our internal combustion engines but without fossil fuels.
This makes me feel angry and helpless.Carbon Engineering of Squamish BC did a demonstration over a decade ago, making synthetic gasoline just from wind and air, at an affordable price. The process could be tweaked to divert some carbon into stable construction materials, making it a carbon-negative fuel that would instantly turn a monster truck into a big Green machine.
The problem with it is that it would kick hell out of the price of fossil fuel and cost investors billions of dollars. So, they promote worse solutions, like hydrogen or ammonia, and then write off the failures on their taxes.
I agree with you that Hydrogen was just a con job, it costs far more to create usable hydrogen than what you get back out of it. It could never be commercially viable.The problem with it is that it would kick hell out of the price of fossil fuel and cost investors billions of dollars. So, they promote worse solutions, like hydrogen or ammonia, and then write off the failures on their taxes.
That made me laugh.Nitrous Oxide isn't a very friendly gas to humans,
Cars running on liquid natural gas became very popular here back in the 80s. Running on gas instead of petrol means a dramatic loss of power (lower octane) and engines wear out more quickly because unlike petrol gas doesn't lubricate the upper cylinders and heads. But gas used to be less than half the price of petrol.know injecting gas is hard watched Ortech develop gaseous fuel injection when I was employed by them.
Nitrous Oxide makes me laugh too.That made me laugh.
Some of your opinions make me laugh, too. Methane has an octane rating of 120 Octane rating - Wikipedia and the lack of carbon in the blow-by, etc. approximately doubles the time between overhauls. A very cheap conversion will lose power, but not a proper one. I used to drive one of each in a Taxi fleet. NOX is a major problem as pollution. There is no reason that one trailer in a road train could not be hauling batteries. The big problem with pure hydrogen is handling it in bulk. It works better to hold it together as methane, and then split it off for use. Burning it is silly, but it does a great job running a fuel cell to make electricity efficiently.Nitrous Oxide makes me laugh too.
The problems come in setting up infrastructure for charging those batteries and the amount of time it takes to charge them. We have been experimenting, including with interchangeable batteries for trucks, but so far nothing is terribly financially viable. For short haul trucking up and down the east coast it's not so bad but once you get west of the Great Dividing Range its a very different world.There is no reason that one trailer in a road train could not be hauling batteries.