• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

My therapist told me there are still single women out there.

Agreed. Anyone who would seek to create, recreate or even simulate the level of meaning of sexual intimacy in a committed monogamous loving relationship by way of sex with a sex worker would be sorely disappointed, I'm sure.

Bearing in mind, however, most often people who partake in the services of sex workers are not looking to recreate or simulate an aspect of relationship intimacy at all and instead are seeking help with fulfilling a basic sexual/physical need and they're more than fine with that. Other than the money aspect, not really much different than the widely accepted "hook up culture" prevalent today.
I think I’m “different” from most guys. Without intimacy and a deep personal connection to the woman, I don’t even want the sex part. I’m more of the “girl” in the bedroom.
 
I think I’m “different” from most guys. Without intimacy and a deep personal connection to the woman, I don’t even want the sex part. I’m more of the “girl” in the bedroom.

I don't think that makes you the "girl" in the bedroom. I would also say I don't think most guys place little value on the importance of connection in a relationship; I think most people in general, men and women combined value intimacy and deep personal connection in relation to a sexual relationship.

I'm just pointing out that that's not always the case. I think there could be many reasons why some people, perhaps only at a certain period or age of their lives or after certain traumatic experiences decide they're perfectly fine and happy to live their life solo with the only addition being occasional physical/sexual intimacy by way of sex work. If that works for them, it's their choice, it's consensual, legal, etc...then I have zero judgement toward that kind of scenario. It actually seems weird to me that others in society in general, with no involvement in such a person's life could or should think that they should be able to dictate, direct, pass judgement on, etc the person for their own individual choices related to the subject. To be clear, I'm in no way saying I think you're doing that, @AspieChris, I'm speaking in general terms.
 
I think I’m “different” from most guys. Without intimacy and a deep personal connection to the woman, I don’t even want the sex part. I’m more of the “girl” in the bedroom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demisexuality
Demisexuality is a sexual orientation in which an individual does not experience primary sexual attraction[2] – the type of attraction that is based on immediately observable characteristics such as appearance or smell and is experienced immediately after a first encounter. A demisexual person can only experience secondary sexual attraction – the type of attraction that occurs after the development of an emotional bond.[3][4] The amount of time that a demisexual individual needs to know another person before developing sexual attraction towards them varies from person to person.[5] Demisexuality is generally categorized on the asexuality spectrum.[6][7]
 
@AspieChris

Needing an emotional connection is healthy, and definitely doesn't put you on the asexuality spectrum.

Actually the reverse (ignoring emotional connections) is a problem (though it seems hard to believe in these strange days):
Starting with sex without even knowing of you like each other is not healthy. OTS's are not healthy. Using artificial means (e.g. alcohol, but there are many non-chemical means) to lower inhibitions isn't healthy.

Note that these behaviors don't seem to be helping anyone. Most of the relevant statistics are getting worse, and the process has been accelerated since use of social media became widespread.
 
I just recalled my therapist asking me “How long do you want your past to keep affecting you?” or something like that.
This is actually a very wise question. But to be honest I too have struggled with letting the past affect my present; not anytime recently, but it was definitely how I used to be.
 
I am about to go to bed but I will mention a point before I do so. I get support without being judged most of the time here.
Me too. Even when the advice doesn’t really help me, it always comes from a place of support and understanding. I didn’t realize it until I found this website, but I was completely alone my whole life. I don’t feel like that anymore.
 
I really feel torn up inside that I will turn 35 this August but have almost nothing to show for romance and intimacy in my life. It’s making me want to commit suicide. My situation feels novel and there aren’t any solutions in sight.
 
My situation feels novel and there aren’t any solutions in sight.
Your situation isn't unusual.

You already know what to do, and that it's not a fast process. You need to get started.
Is it "One day ...", or "First day!!" ?

If it's "first day!" soon you're still ok. If it's still "one day ...", in 5 years or so the difficulty will start increasing quite quickly.

My fears keep becoming more and more apt. I am 35 and I am still alone.
You're still in the very best range (31/32 to 35-37, depending on the individual).

Don't wait.
 
Last edited:
Your situation isn't unusual.

You already know what to do, and that it's not a fast process. You need to get started.
Is it "One day ...", or "First day!!" ?

If it's "first day!" soon you're still ok. If it's still "one day ...", in 5 years or so the difficulty will start increasing quite quickly.


You're still in the very best range (31/32 to 35-37, depending on the individual).

Don't wait.
Yes you are. And this is the age when a lot of women start understanding that good looks and a fast car are worthless in the long run. There’s a LOT of divorcées out there in their mid 30’s who now understand that a kind personality matters most and will look right past any of your faults.

My wife had just come out of an abusive marriage when we met. She watched me have a couple of meltdowns before we got engaged and she didn’t even flinch. By the time the first one happened, she had already seen what kind of person I really was on the inside. And because of her previous “partner” (who was pretty good looking and made lots of money) she didn’t care at all.
 
To your original post about whether there are single women still "out there". Not only are there, of course, but the number within the next decade is predicted to explode. I forget the estimated percentage, but if I recall correctly it's supposed to be something like 60% or more of women who are currently age 30 or younger will be single and alone in their middle age onward.
 
@Magna

I think you're probably right, but most of the statistics that get thrown around online are questionable.

Here are some facts that I found interesting, and came from a reasonably reliable source:

1. Marriages are way down in the US.
This is consistent with your "single woman" stat, but it's not clear what the consequences will be. I'm hoping that @AspieChris is right, and that women will somehow come to terms with the downsides of hypergamy. But TBH I'm not optimistic.

2. Among women who have children, the number of children per woman is about the same as in the past (think post WW2), but there are more women who never have children.
So the coming population collapse is due to fewer women following something like the historically "standard child-raising pattern".

3. The timing has changed.
The average age of the first child born to mothers is significantly later than in the near-past.
The started in the mid-1970's, almost certainly due to the hormonal contraceptives for women ("the pill").

I think there's a causal connection between (2) and (3).

(3) is why Markness's timing is still ok. If it was the 1970's, he'd be considered quite old to be looking for a Life Partner. In 2023 he's In the "sweet spot".
 
Also….. go out and have fun doing whatever interests you. The gym, grocery store, etc. Approach her like you just want to be helpful and the date opportunity might be HER idea (you’ll still have to ask, but it’s easier if she was already thinking it because you’re AWESOME)The best partner would have the same interests. Women are usually attracted to someone who is happy, laughing, enjoying whatever it is that they’re doing. And it’s a hell of a lot easier to start a conversation when there’s something ‘real’ to talk about.

1 more: Don’t focus on looking in places where people usually go on dates.
Wow, deja vue all over again. We had harmonious interests and I found her in a place as far away from traditional dating as possible. I loved outdoor activities and got involved with outings groups where interest and helpfulness was rewarded. Then, I met my future spouse as a result of a national outing we both signed up for. I called her up to carpool and had few expectations since we lived 300 miles apart (Chicago - Detroit). we talked for over a month planning our road trip and talking about conditioning and gear. When we met IRL I was hoping to meet a woman who loved outdoor activities, and she was hoping to meet a man to do outdoor activities with. We made the long distance dating work, then I moved to Chicago and we prospered together.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom