The big one is that non-ASD gifted have a natural instinct for NT protocols that I absolutely do not have. It is like they are neurologically bilingual, but their hyper-focus strongly resembles ours.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
The big one is that non-ASD gifted have a natural instinct for NT protocols that I absolutely do not have. It is like they are neurologically bilingual
On a related note, both Aspergers and non-ASD gifted tend to have more allergies and more inclination to myopia.For me, I think sensory sensitivities are another huge difference between AS and non-AS gifted. It comes and goes, but there are times when I'm absolutely overwhelmed with certain streams of sensory data, and no amount of "relaxation techniques" can tone it down.
On a related note, both Aspergers and non-ASD gifted tend to have more allergies and more inclination to myopia.
I have seasonal allergies and a mild[?] allergy to bumblebee stings, but no myopia. (I have presbyopia, now, though.)...but I don't have allergies or myopia.
Right now, the dividing line seems to be cognitive function or dysfunction.Will they later group AS people by cause (e.g., "this gene" or "that gene", or "this environmental trigger" or "that environmental trigger"), or by characteristics (e.g., "this set of deficits/strengths" or "that set of deficits/strengths")?
This is interesting to me as I have very bad seasonal allergies, along with allergies to many skin products and some foods. I don't have myopia, but I do have other vision issues.On a related note, both Aspergers and non-ASD gifted tend to have more allergies and more inclination to myopia.
I enjoyed your response Mike, thank you.
Agreed, knowing earlier would not have significantly changed anything, for me the concept of knowing is deep within me rather than externally.
For example.
I am not prone to loneliness because I understand it is my nature to be alone, I do not seek its opposite. That doesn't mean I am never lonely, as I can be when I put my mind to it.
When I used to be asked; 'why do you keep shaking your leg?', 'why do you sit staring?', 'why does everything in this part of the room have to stay the same?', all I could say was 'I don't know'. That is a small selection of so many 'I don't knows'.
In understanding my true nature I also remove the 'I don't knows' because now I know why.
When we know why we are empowered. Nothing is greener, nothing has probably changed, except our viewpoint of self.
I am indeed glad that I have gotten this far in one piece. I have had adventures enough to write a book or two, yet along the way I have lost loved ones because all I could say was 'I don't know'.